Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

06 January 2012

Life cycles of cities

Hong Kong has had its “glorious” moments. There was a time when China maintained a closed-door policy, and Hong Kong was the only gateway connecting China with the rest of the world. We prospered because of the unique role we played between China and the other countries. Since China opened up its doors under the government of Deng Xiao Ping, Hong Kong’s significance to China has slowly declined.

We used to be a great entrepĂ´t. Not any more. Business routes between major cities in China and the outside world have become direct. Nothing needs to go through Hong Kong before entering China now. It used to be that there could be no direct contact between China and Taiwan. Therefore, people from both Taiwan and the Chinese mainland had to stop over in Hong Kong before moving on to either Taiwan or the mainland. This practice will soon come to a complete halt, as both the Taiwanese and the Chinese governments are eager to boost direct trade and cultural exchange between the two places.


Hong Kong construction worker scales scaffolding.
It is a well-known fact that Hong Kong depends on her mother country to prosper. As other cities in China become more developed and better connected to the global village, Hong Kong is losing its strategic importance. Our previous industrial and business orientations have changed from those of manufacturing to those of a service industry, manifested as banking, finance and tourism. Like other cities in the world, we are going through a cycle: struggle, development, prosperity, fading importance and struggle.

Members of a Hong Kong domestic workers union demonstrate.
Many a time, I hear visitors remarking that other Chinese cities are doing a lot better, implying that Hong Kong is lagging behind in many dimensions, losing its valour and glamour to neighboring areas and major cities in China.

Public housing estate in Hong Kong.
I am somewhat amazed that such remarks are being made. Just as families go through life cycles, so do cities. We have had our share of cheap labor in manufacturing. We were the production house for many developed countries for goods such as garments, toys and watches. Then, because of rising production costs, our factories moved inland to the southern part of China. Even in southern China, the situation is becoming more competitive now. Global manufacturers keep looking for cheaper places to produce their goods. Many production houses have been moved to Vietnam, Cambodia, and so on.

There are few cities on earth like New York, London, Paris or Tokyo, where the city never seems to grow old. Hong Kong may be progressing toward older age. But we are still bursting with life, with a population of more than seven million.

So Hong Kong will lose its attractiveness. But it is my hometown, where I have my roots and where many members of my family still reside. And there is no place like home.

For Reflections on Nursing Leadership (RNL), published by the Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International.

02 June 2011

On laws that you must make provision for your parents


I find it interesting as well as intriguing that Singapore and some provinces in China have laws stating that one must make provision for one’s parents. In those places, filial piety is not just part of a citizen’s moral obligation, but a requirement of the law.


What if the parents are awful parents? What if the children make provisions for their parents, but verbally abuse and mentally torture them? What if the children do not love their parents, and only provide for them out of a sense of duty? Would the parents like that? Would proud parents accept money from their children in that situation? What if the parents are well off but the children are not? I gave birth to my children and raised them until they could stand on their own two feet. Does that qualify me to receive lifelong provision from them?


I am very interested to know how the law addresses these questions in view of the complexities of human relationships.


For Reflections on Nursing Leadership (RNL), published by the Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International.

14 March 2011

Fair and chic

A nice tan is much pursued by ladies (and maybe gents) of the West, but it is not so for people in the East. While the tan of someone in a Western country may be the result of a vacation in some exotic tropical place, dark skin is undesirable in the East.

Have you ever noticed while traveling in Asia that women (and men too, sometimes) like to carry an umbrella with them to shade them from the sun? It is not only older women who do this, although they are more inclined to do so. Many younger Asian women are aware of the damage that ultraviolet rays will do to their skin. Lying on the beach or the balcony to enjoy the sun is not a common pastime for Asian women, unless they are very westernized. Fairness in complexion or, to be exact, whiteness of the skin, is valued a lot more than a nice tan in Asia, probably by both sexes.


If you travel in Vietnam, where a bike—motorized or non-motorized—is a common vehicle for commuting, you will see women wearing long detachable sleeves on their arms. The same if you visit Japan; you will come across many women wearing large-brimmed hats and detachable sleeves on their arms while taking a stroll in the park.

While a tan on someone in the West may indicate affluence, in the sense that they have taken a vacation to enjoy distant beaches and the sun, it may imply something different in the East. Traditionally, only Asian women who are from the working class need to work outside of their home and be exposed to the merciless sun.

There is a saying in southern China that mere whiteness of the skin is capable of masking three counts of ugliness in a person. So there you go.





For Reflections on Nursing Leadership (RNL), published by the Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International.